 |
| From 2019 -- Fr Dennis, second from left, with members of the homeless community then sleeping at the outskirts of his parish of St. Philip Benizi in Fullerton. |
By Fr. Dennis-Zdenek M. Kriz, OSM – July 8, 2020
Fr. Dennis was the chair of the Friar Servants of Mary, USA
Province’s Justice and Peace Committee, 2000-2006, as well as member of the Friar
Servants of Mary order-wide Secretariat for Justice, Peace and Care of Creation
from 2007-2013. In recent years, in
addition to having been an all but immovable defender the dignity of Immigrants (a son of Czechoslovakian immigrants himself), often of color, he has become
an outspoken defender of those people who find themselves homeless in Orange
County, CA.
Common Americans, and specifically common American Catholics, have been aggressively targeted in recent months by various “authorities” seeking
to scare them about “the dangers of the Black Lives Movement” often simply referred
to as BLM (quite possibly to avoid having to admit that BLACK LIVES do MATTER…).
Tired of such nonsense that fundamentally MISSES THE POINT –
Black people are being KILLED in the United States FOR TRIVIAL THINGS,
certainly NOT WARRANTING _DEATH_ -- I’ve decided to provide this analysis of
the Black Lives Matter mission statement and statement on its origins to set
minds at ease.
(1) Black Lives Matter, BLM, has been accused of being
Marxist and pro-abortion.
Yet scanning for the following terms -- marx, marxism, abortion,
choice, choose – yield NO RESULTS on both their “What we believe” and “Herstory”
(origins) pages (scan for them yourselves).
So … unless ANY statement about justice / injustice is by
definition “Marxist” this is just a typical dismissive accusation made routinely
against ALL movements that try to bring greater justice in the world. Martin Luther King, Jr and Nelson Mandela as
well as their organizations, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and
the African National Congress (ANC) were in their time accused of the same.
Indeed the BLACK LIVES MATTER, BLM, movement sees itself as
one of solidarity rather than “defeating enemies”
“Every day, we recommit to healing ourselves and each other,
and to co-creating alongside comrades, allies, and family a culture where each
person feels seen, heard, and supported.
“We acknowledge, respect, and celebrate differences and
commonalities.
“We work vigorously for freedom and justice for Black people
and, by extension, all people.
“We intentionally build and nurture a beloved community that
is bonded together through a beautiful struggle that is restorative, not
depleting.”
MY THOUGHTS …
“A BEAUTIFUL STRUGGLE that is RESTORATIVE, NOT DEPLETING …” unless
_any_ struggle is _by definition_ Marxist (was the American Revolution Marxist?
Was the Solidarity Movement in Poland, Marxist?) while the adjective “beautiful”
seems to “protest too much”, the “restorative, not depleting” qualifiers
indicate that the purpose is not to destroy but rather to build, expand, to set
more / all people free. It’s hard to
find fault in that …
(2) Black Lives Matter, BLM, has been further accused of
being “radical” / “radical feminist,” “pro-trans” and against “traditional” (nuclear)
family.
Relevant passages on their “What we believe” and “Herstory” pages
would be:
“We are unapologetically Black in our positioning. In affirming
that Black Lives Matter, we need not qualify our position. To love and desire
freedom and justice for ourselves is a prerequisite for wanting the same for
others…
“We are guided by the fact that all Black lives matter, regardless
of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, gender expression,
economic status, ability, disability, religious beliefs or disbeliefs,
immigration status, or location.
“We make space for transgender brothers and sisters to
participate and lead.
“We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle
cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women
who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence.
“We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from
sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered.
“We practice empathy. We engage comrades with the intent to
learn about and connect with their contexts….
“We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do
so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of
heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are
heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).
“We cultivate an intergenerational and communal network free
from ageism. We believe that all people, regardless of age, show up with the
capacity to lead and learn.
“We embody and practice justice, liberation, and peace in
our engagements with one another.”
“As organizers who work with everyday people, BLM members
see and understand significant gaps in movement spaces and leadership. Black
liberation movements in this country have created room, space, and leadership
mostly for Black heterosexual, cisgender men — leaving women, queer and
transgender people, and others either out of the movement or in the background
to move the work forward with little or no recognition. As a network, we have
always recognized the need to center the leadership of women and queer and
trans people. To maximize our movement muscle, and to be intentional about not
replicating harmful practices that excluded so many in past movements for
liberation, we made a commitment to placing those at the margins closer to the
center.”
MY THOUGHTS:
So Black Lives Matter (BLM) is not so much “pro-trans” or “pro-radical
feminist” as the past / current society has been (quite radically) ANTI-trans, ANTI-women,
insisting on their staying in their place, insisting on their marginalization.
“We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to
fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice
that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in
private even as they participate in public justice work.
“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure
requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that
collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that
mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”
MY THOUGHTS:
Here it needs to be said that the “nuclear family” as we
know it came to be, in the West, only after the introduction of Social Security
in the U.S. and equivalent programs elsewhere.
That is, until the 1930s ALL FAMILIES EVERYWHERE were “extended families”
because most older people had _no means of providing for themselves_ except
depending on their adult children. And
even today, many/most poorer families remain organized as Extended Families,
where “auntie or grandma” fullfill the role of “day care” that richer families are
able to pay for elsewhere.
Further, until a generation ago, the sense of community / neighborhood
was near universal. EVERYONE still growing
up, up-to the 1960s had stories of “the mother’s CIA” in which one did
something even blocks away from home and by the time one got home, mom was
waiting at the door to discipline said kid, because news already reached her
via this neighborhood network of “mom’s CIA.”
Only in recent decades did we come to the point where people don’t know
their own neighbors.
So BLM here is actually refreshingly _restorative_ not “radical.”
MY CONCLUSION:
All in all BLACK LIVES MATTER is being unfairly besmirched for
speaking Truth and seeking to make society better for all.
ADDENDUM (July 10, 2020) --
I find it simply absurd to focus on the hyperbolized faults of the organization
founded around the Black Lives Matter movement OVER the REALITY that created the
movement / organization – the REPEATED KILLING OF BLACK PEOPLE IN THE UNITED
STATES FOR TRIVIAL REASONS, CERTAINLY _NOT_ WARRANTING _DEATH_.
Let
me offer this analogy:
Catholics and
Baptists theologically have very little in common. Baptists definitely don’t
recognize the Pope nor our Hierarchy, nor any of our sacramental system. YET WE
COOPERATE PRETTY MUCH _EVERYWHERE_ IN THE COUNTRY in feeding the poor, clothing
the naked, etc. We cooperate similarly
with our Jewish brothers and sisters and EVEN AT TIMES with our Muslim brothers
and sisters EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW THAT IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT THEY WILL EVER
UNDERSTAND JESUS IN THE SAME WAY AS WE DO.
What
makes it so hard for so many to do the same with regard to Black
Lives Matter when clearly one does not need to agree with every aspect or even
many aspects of the Organization’s mission statement?
In
this regard, I want to simply underline (and applaud) that the USCCB has done basically this. Regardless of whatever reservations the
Bishops could have with the Black Lives Matter organization, IT HAS
FUNDAMENTALLY EMBRACED THE POINT that BLACK LIVES DO MATTER and organized yet
another campaign against racism (http://usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/racism/index.cfm)
This
fulfills well the repeated assertions of the Magisterium that whatever
reservations it may have with “Certain Aspects of Liberation Theology” or with
the manner of life of homosexual persons, these reservations can not be used as
an excuse to ignore the plight of the poor or to treat the homosexual person
with disrespect.:
1. The warning against the serious deviations of some
"theologies of liberation" must not be taken as some kind of
approval, even indirect, of those who keep the poor in misery, who profit from
that misery, who notice it while doing nothing about it, or who remain
indifferent to it. The Church, guided by the Gospel of mercy and by the love
for mankind, hears the cry for justice [28] and intends to respond to it with
all her might.
